The search marketing industry, providing search engine
ranking or search engine marketing type services to website owners, is, give or
take a year or two, about 15 years old now.
There are several ways to define SEO Ethics, and it
really depends on what your end goal is. Are we trying to define what is
ethical SEO and what is not ethical SEO? Because let's just take one look at
that:
• Automatically
generated content
• Creating
pages with little or no original content
• Cloaking
• Sneaky
redirects
• Hidden
text or links
• Doorway
pages
• Scraped
content
• Participating
in affiliate programs without adding sufficient value
• Loading
pages with irrelevant keywords
• Creating
pages with malicious behavior, such as phishing or installing viruses, trojans,
or other badware
• Abusing
rich snippets markup
But lately, let's say in the last five years or so, there
have been lots of SEO companies who have taken their clients' money and
participated in link schemes in an effort to get the client higher search
engine rankings. Link schemes like this:
• Buying
or selling links that pass PageRank
• Excessive
link exchanges ("Link to me and I'll link to you") or partner pages
exclusively for the sake of cross-linking
• Large-scale
article marketing or guest posting campaigns with keyword-rich anchor text
links
• Using
automated programs or services to create links to your site
• Text
advertisements that pass PageRank
• Advertorials
or native advertising where payment is received for articles that include links
that pass PageRank
• Links
with optimized anchor text in articles or press releases distributed on other
sites. Low-quality directory or bookmark site links
• Keyword-rich,
hidden or low-quality links embedded in widgets that are distributed across
various sites,
• Widely
distributed links in the footers or templates of various sites
• Forum
comments with optimized links in the post or signature
As an SEO company or someone providing SEO services for
hire, one needs to make sure that they are not deceiving the client or website
owner. Deceiving a client or website owner could mean something along the lines
of:
• Not
guaranteeing search engine rankings
• Being
transparent on the SEO methods used for higher search engine rankings
• Taking
the time to educate the client about SEO best practices
• Not
deceiving the client
Is it the basic "SEO Ethics" of performing
search engine optimization for a website that we're after when defining
"SEO Ethics"? Because if that's the case, then we need to look as far
as the Google Webmaster Guidelines. Or is it much greater than that? Do
"SEO Ethics" need to actually define the search marketing industry as
a whole? Do we really need to put a "code of SEO ethics" in place so
that search marketers (or SEOs, for that matter), get rid of the stigma that I
despise: "SEOs are just selling snake oil"?
We absolutely do not need the SEO Police. If we were to
define an SEO Code of Ethics, then frankly that code is only as good as the
enforcement of those ethics. We all know what happens in a town when speed
limit signs are put up: but as soon as word gets out that the police never pull
people over for speeding, then what's the point? People ignore those speed
limits.
For more details on our products and services, please feel
free to visit us at Best Online Marketing Company India,
Online Marketing Companies India &
Internet Marketing Company India
No comments:
Post a Comment